Criminal Attorney Case Files
People vs. Brady Douglas

santa rosa criminal defense attorney - 24/7

Santa Rosa Criminal Defense Attorney Case Files: People vs. Brady Douglas

The Santa Rosa criminal defense attorneys at Adams Fietz have reviewed the case of People v. Brady Douglas, filed on April 11, 2017. The California Court of Appeals considered a whether the trial court erred in denying a Wheeler motion after the prosecutor peremptorily excused two openly gay prospective jurors. (People v. Wheeler (1978) 22 Cal.3d 258 (Wheeler); see also Batson v. Kentucky (1986) 476 U.S. 79 [90 L.Ed.2d 69] (Batson).)

Both the state and federal Constitutions prohibit using peremptory challenges to remove prospective jurors based solely on group bias. (Wheeler, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 272; Batson, supra, 476 U.S. at p. 84.) “It is well settled that ‘[a] prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to strike prospective jurors on the basis of group bias--that is, bias against “members of an identifiable group distinguished on racial, religious, ethnic, or similar grounds”--violates the right of a criminal defendant to trial by a jury drawn from a representative cross-section of the community under article I, section 16 of the California Constitution.’ ” (People v. Hamilton (2009) 45 Cal.4th 863, 898 (Hamilton); Wheeler, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 272.) “Such a practice also violates the defendant’s right to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.” (Hamilton, at p. 898; Batson, supra, 476 U.S. at p. 88.)

Although the United States Supreme Court has yet to address whether Batson extends to sexual orientation, the Ninth Circuit held in SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. Abbott Labs. (9th Cir. 2014) 740 F.3d 471, 484 (SmithKline), that equal protection prohibits peremptory strikes based on sexual orientation under Batson. The Court in this case also found that excluding prospective jurors solely on the basis of sexual orientation runs afoul of the constitutional principles espoused in Batson/Wheeler.

To determine whether a prosecutor impermissibly used peremptory challenges to remove prospective jurors based on a group bias such as sexual orientation, courts engage in a three-part analysis. A defendant must first make a prima facie case by demonstrating that the facts give rise to an inference of discriminatory purpose. (People v. Cornwell (2005) 37 Cal.4th 50, 66 (Cornwell), disapproved on other grounds by People v. Doolin (2009) 45 Cal.4th 390, 421, fn. 22 (Doolin).) If that showing is made, the burden next shifts to the prosecution to explain its challenge on the basis of permissible, group-neutral justifications. (Id. at pp. 66-67.) If such an explanation is offered, the trial court then must decide whether defendant has established purposeful group discrimination. (Id. at p. 67; Johnson v. California (2005) 545 U.S. 162, 168 [162 L.Ed.2d 129, 138] (Johnson).)

The Court of Appeals remanded the case for further proceedings so the trial court may apply a mixed-motive analysis to the peremptory challenges. On remand, the prosecutor shall have the opportunity to show that he would have stricken both jurors even without considering their sexual orientation.

why you should hire ben adams as your criminal defense attorney

  • In 2016, the readers of the Bohemian voted Ben the best criminal defense attorney in Sonoma County. He knows what he is doing.
  • Criminal Defense Attorney Ben Adams has concentrated his practice for over 20 years on criminal defense. He has tried well over 100 criminal jury trials – everything from driving offenses to cold case murder. He knows how to analyze a case and help you get the best possible outcome.
  • Ben Adams is familiar with the local court system - he has appeared in front of every judge many times. He knows the DA’s and how to negotiate with them.
  • He understands that everyone has a different priority. For some clients, avoiding prison is enough. For others, just being convicted can ruin their lives. He always asks what your priority is and does all he can to help you achieve that result.
  • He is accessible. Our phone number - 707-999-9999 - is very hard to forget. Ben wants to make sure he's available for his clients.
  • He has an excellent support staff. Anyone who has ever worked with Allie knows she is the finest criminal office manager in the County. A law student herself, Allie is dedicated to the firm’s criminal defense clients.
  • He’ll be honest with you. If you are facing the full might of the State you need a lawyer who can honestly assess the evidence against you and give it to you straight. It serves you no good to hire a lawyer who either doesn’t know how to read the situation or isn’t brave enough to be honest with you.
  • He cares. Ben Adams isn’t a criminal defense attorney for no reason. He genuinely distrusts the Government and he is fully aware of the power of the State to ruin lives. He isn’t afraid of the State and he isn’t just going through the motions.
  • His fees are reasonable. No competent lawyer is going to be cheap but Ben works hard to charge a fair fee. Satisfied clients are his greatest sources of referrals.
santa rosa criminal defense lawyer ben adams

About
Criminal Defense Attorney
Ben Adams

Ben Adams is an award winning Criminal Defense Attorney and was voted “Best Criminal Defense Attorney in Santa Rosa” by The Bohemian.

Ben is passionate, relentless and experienced in all types of criminal law.

Criminal defense attorney Ben Adams is the type of trusted and experienced lawyer you need on your side when you have been charged with a criminal offense.

When you need a lawyer, call the experts